I cannot agree more with that. It's not easy for the average user to understand the "mailing list rule", all they care is to get the answer as soon as possible. If they can get the answer from localize channel, they won't dig the mailing list. So It could be a good way if the committer or developer can guide them to find the answer in a more public way.
As a committer I wants to get touch with more users from different communication channel, and we just need to keep in mind of the "mailing list rule". For the user who don't want to subscribe the mailing list, nabble[1] would be another choice. It just works as a forum to mailing list bridge. Maybe we need to consider to introduce another bridge between the user mailing and stackoverflow. [1]http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/ Willem Jiang Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I actually take a different tack on that. > > I answer questions everywhere and provide a pointer for other fora for > followups. It gives a friendlier feeling, improves searchability and still > encourages the mailing lists. > > My experience is that simply not answering and pushing the OP to the lists > has a low success rate. > > Another approach is to post the answer on the mailing lists and put a link > to that thread on the non-Apache site. That's a bit friendlier, but I > don't think it is as good. > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Jeff Genender <jgenen...@savoirtech.com> > wrote: > >> I’m not sure that changes anything… that has been the nature of this >> since the beginning. >> >> For Apache… most happens on the mailing lists for very obvious reasons. >> Doing things outside tand not bringing them to the lists is frowned upon >> because it leaves the rest of the community in the dark. >> >> You see the challenges… they were explicitly discussed in this thread. >> English is unfortunately/fortunately the adaptor of communication to the >> world. Thats not “western arrogance”. Its a fact. Someone has to be the >> mediator and english it is. >> >> If a community wants to extend across borders and get more non-localized >> input, then english will likely be the need. If a project/PMC does not, >> care, then utilize your language de-jour with the understanding of the >> consequences. >> >> I don’t really see a solution beyond that. I guess if you have an area >> where the devs discuss in another language and someone wants to translate >> it to english and bring it to the lists so others can be a part of it, I >> assume that would work. But that seems like a lot of work to me. Do you >> have a better solution? >> >> Jeff >> >> >> > On Nov 11, 2016, at 11:32 AM, Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > A few things... >> > >> > 1. There's a huge thriving Apache community in China that operates >> outside of "everything happens on mailing lists." >> > 2. As a committer in an incubator, I want to have insight into those >> communities. >> > 3. I need to figure out if there's anything that can be done to >> encourage this class of contributors to engage more with the worldwide >> community since they are a huge source of potential committers. >> > 4. The language barrier is a real issue where language-to-English >> translators seem to work fine but not vice versa. >> > >> > So, in essence: new interesting challenges in community building. >> > >> > Gunnar >> > >> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Jeff Genender < >> jgenen...@savoirtech.com <mailto:jgenen...@savoirtech.com>> wrote: >> > and you got your answer…. what changes? >> > >> > Jeff >> > >> > >> > > On Nov 11, 2016, at 10:44 AM, Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com >> <mailto:tapper.gun...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > > >> > > Hang on a second. This was not a discussion about RocketMQ. I asked a >> question on the incubators list from a larger-picture perspective using >> Trafodion and RocketMQ as examples. As noted, neither Raynold nor I are >> part of the RocketMQ incubator so let's not ding that project for opinions >> expressed by individuals. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > >> > > Gunnar >> > > >> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Jeff Genender <jgenen...@apache.org >> <mailto:jgenen...@apache.org> <mailto:jgenen...@apache.org <mailto: >> jgenen...@apache.org>>> wrote: >> > > >> > > > On Nov 11, 2016, at 12:42 AM, Reynold Xin <r...@apache.org <mailto: >> r...@apache.org> <mailto:r...@apache.org <mailto:r...@apache.org>>> >> wrote: >> > > > I'd avoid using the argument that English will bring more users, as >> it is not defensible and risk being interpreted as western arrogance. >> Afterall, three out of the six largest Internet companies (by market cap) >> are currently in mainland China, and they all have enormous daily active >> users even though they are targeting primarily Chinese. >> > > >> > > The world is much bigger than a discussion for where the largest ISPs >> reside. ;-) Lets not degrade this discussion into an argument about whose >> country is the best. That does nobody any good and its straw man. >> > > >> > > I think you are the one being defensive and if you read what I said, >> as I stated it pretty clear in my first few sentences and through out my >> statement. Read it again. That was certainly *not* my argument and my >> argument was most *definitely* defensible. >> > > >> > > I never said English will bring in more users than China. I *did* >> say that if you want more international/cross-border users, you will need >> to use a more international language. Outside of China I will also say >> that the rest of the world mostly does not know Chinese. >> > > >> > > For the record, I am a messaging lover. I am a committer/PMC on >> ActiveMQ, and I love to play with Kafka and other MQs outside the ASF such >> as RabbitMQ. I can honestly tell you directly that if your discussions are >> in Chinese, I will likely never play with your software. Now based on your >> tone, I am guessing that likely you do not care. That is fine. But there >> are a lot of folks who will be in the same boat as me. *You* need to >> define on who your want your audience to be. >> > > >> > > You can call me (and others who don’t speak Chinese) western >> “arrogance” because our main language is an international one. But it’s >> not going to change your situation or position. >> > > >> > > I’m not really sure of why you are coming to members@ asking advice, >> then getting defensive to those about answers that you don’t want to hear. >> What responses were you looking for? Were you looking that the rest of the >> members who mostly don’t speak Chinese to answer that its a great idea? If >> this is the attitude you will take, then you are wasting our time in >> attempting to answer you. >> > > >> > > Jeff >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Genender < >> jgenen...@apache.org <mailto:jgenen...@apache.org> <mailto: >> jgenen...@apache.org <mailto:jgenen...@apache.org>> <mailto: >> jgenen...@apache.org <mailto:jgenen...@apache.org> <mailto: >> jgenen...@apache.org <mailto:jgenen...@apache.org>>>> wrote: >> > > > I would think that English is generally used because its the most >> international language, not because its the most used in the world. Thus >> it helps cross borders for communication. At the end of the day, I think >> you need to look at your community and ask if you want it to cross borders >> or not. Do you want worldwide contribution (and adoption)? I can tell you >> that I glean a lot of information from the mail lists when I run into >> problems or issues using Apache software. If the discussions are in >> Chinese, you may miss a lot of people who can be a part of the discussion >> from outside of China. I think you really need to think about who you want >> your users to be and how you want your product adopted. >> > > > >> > > > In addition, this is an incubated project. AFAICT, the champion >> doesn’t speak Chinese, and I am wild-guessing maybe 2 of the mentors do. >> This means the other mentors may have a difficult time steering the project >> when they are needed. It makes it difficult for the champion to asses any >> problems without having someone notify him of a translated issue. In the >> unlikely event that the project requires input from the incubation PMC or, >> the board for that matter, it would be very difficult to get a proper >> insight into the issues without have solid knowledge of the language. >> > > > >> > > > I personally don’t know of any rule or regulation that locks down a >> language and perhaps a board member can chime in on that. But my .02 is >> that if I were bringing a project to Apache, my thoughts about community >> would be getting as many people and users involved as possible. If you >> don’t use a more cross-border/international language, then I believe that >> you may ultimately be hindering your project beyond your borders. I think >> that would be a shame. OTOH, maybe your desire is to keep RocketMQ a >> Chinese piece of software. I guess that is ok too… but I would be >> interested in why. >> > > > >> > > > Just my usual .02. >> > > > >> > > > Jeff >> > > > >> > > > > On Nov 10, 2016, at 11:53 PM, Tom Barber <t...@spicule.co.uk >> <mailto:t...@spicule.co.uk> <mailto:t...@spicule.co.uk <mailto: >> t...@spicule.co.uk>> <mailto:t...@spicule.co.uk <mailto:t...@spicule.co.uk> >> <mailto:t...@spicule.co.uk <mailto:t...@spicule.co.uk>>>> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > I believe I saw something the other day where someone was talking >> about diverse languages on mailing lists. personally I think it's okay but >> obviously it decreases the chance of participation of others. >> > > > > >> > > > > of course the old saying "if it wasn't discussed on the list it >> never happened" didn't mention the language. >> > > > > >> > > > > Thought must be taken for jira and code comments as well. how >> would non Chinese speaking people follow development? >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On 11 Nov 2016 06:45, "Reynold Xin" <r...@apache.org <mailto: >> r...@apache.org> <mailto:r...@apache.org <mailto:r...@apache.org>> >> <mailto:r...@apache.org <mailto:r...@apache.org> <mailto:r...@apache.org >> <mailto:r...@apache.org>>> <mailto:r...@apache.org <mailto: >> r...@apache.org> <mailto:r...@apache.org <mailto:r...@apache.org>> >> <mailto:r...@apache.org <mailto:r...@apache.org> <mailto:r...@apache.org >> <mailto:r...@apache.org>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > Adding members@ >> > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@apache.org >> <mailto:r...@apache.org> <mailto:r...@apache.org <mailto:r...@apache.org>> >> <mailto:r...@apache.org <mailto:r...@apache.org> <mailto:r...@apache.org >> <mailto:r...@apache.org>>> <mailto:r...@apache.org <mailto: >> r...@apache.org> <mailto:r...@apache.org <mailto:r...@apache.org>> >> <mailto:r...@apache.org <mailto:r...@apache.org> <mailto:r...@apache.org >> <mailto:r...@apache.org>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > To play devil's advocate: is it OK for Apache projects that >> consist >> > > > > > primarily of Chinese developers to communicate in Chinese? Or >> put it >> > > > > > differently -- is it a requirement that all communications must >> be in >> > > > > > English? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I can see an inclusiveness argument for having to use English, >> as English >> > > > > > is one of the most common languages. However, many talented >> software >> > > > > > developers in China don't have the sufficient level of >> proficiency when it >> > > > > > comes to English, as the penetration rate of English in China >> is much lower >> > > > > > than other countries. It is as hard for Chinese speakers to >> learn English >> > > > > > as for English speakers to learn Chinese. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > One can certainly argue forcing everybody to use English will >> also exclude >> > > > > > those Chinese developers, and from the perspective of the >> number of native >> > > > > > speakers, Mandarin (a Chinese dialect) outnumbers English 3 to >> 1 according >> > > > > > to Wikipedia. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Similar argument also applies to Japanese, and many other >> countries, >> > > > > > except the number of Chinese speakers is much larger. >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Thanks, >> > > >> > > Gunnar >> > > If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Gunnar >> > If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right. >> >> >
