JB Can you clarify what you mean by legal here?
On Jan 2, 2017 13:05, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: -1 I understand your point, but, even if it's not in the version, having a keyword that the project is still in incubation is important (from a legal perspective, I don't talk about the release itself). In the version, artifactId or classifier don't matter, however, having this flag is important IMHO. Regards JB On 01/02/2017 06:22 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > I'm calling to vote on a proposed policy change. Current guide at [1] > indicates that maven artifacts should include incubator (or incubating) in > the version string of maven artifacts. Its labeled as a best practice, not > a requirement and is not a policy followed on other repository management > tools (e.g. PyPi). > > I therefore push forward that the incubator will cease expecting java-based > projects to publish artifacts with "-incubating" in the version string, > with the understanding that: > > - Incubating is a term used to refer to a project's stability, not a > release's stability. It is generally understood that incubating projects > are not necessarily immature, but may have a potential of failing to become > a TLP. > - Podling releases are endorsed, the podling itself is not endorsed. We > will not approve releases that are blatantly against ASF policies. > > > [ ] +1 Drop the -incubator/-incubating expectation of maven projects > [ ] +/0 > [ ] -1 Don't drop because.... > > > [1]: > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release-java.html#best-practice-maven > > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
