On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:11 PM Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> > wrote: > > Not sure what was the decision to be made here, but +1 to all > suggestions. > > All of PPMC as podling owners makes sense to me as long as > private@podling > > is notified. > > The following four podlings don't have private@podling lists: > ["log4cxx2", "odftoolkit", "ratis"]. > > private@logging and odf-private. > ratis being a clear example of 'not yet'. > > So a revised approach: emails go to private@podling list, if there is > one. If not, it goes to the designated private list (e.g. > private@logging). If there are no such private list designated, it > goes to private@incubator. > It sounds like we need to have an attribute for the private list. > > If people would like, I could always copy private@incubator on all > changes for additional oversight. That might be a bit much, however. > > - Sam Ruby > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
