Hi Bertrand, > On 25 Apr 2017, at 09:04, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> > wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org> > wrote: >> ...Hitesh recently raised the issue that the artifact that passes the vote >> MUST be the one that we actually release... > > Yes in terms of having the same binary digests and signatures, but > renaming the files is fine IMO, especially for removing an -rc suffix > which makes total sense. I would just add that step to your release > process documentation to make it clear. > >> ...Rename/rebuild after final vote (This is what Airflow is doing, and Beam >> does this, I believe)... > > I'd say rename yes but rebuild no, in order to keep the same digests > and signatures. >
As mentioned earlier, that seems not to be possible. The metadata (filename) and version information inside the package need to be in sync. This how the python build tools and python ecosystem works. - Bolke. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
