Those are "convenience binaries" ... not "binary releases".
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 2:25 AM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > While I agree that binary artifacts are for convenience purposes, if one > searches our dist folder they will find lots of projects with binary > releases. > > When reviewing binary archives we need to make sure that the license file > is updated with the shiped dependencies licenses appropriately and that > they are all compatible with the Apache License (notice file might also > need to be updated). > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 05:38 Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:25 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > > >... > > > > > As a reviewer, how am I to vote on this release candidate? > > > > > > You do NOT vote on binary artifacts. Since you cannot release binaries, > you > > should not put the Foundation's imprimatur on those artifacts (and as PMC > > Member, that is what your vote represents). > > > > > > > Should I vote -1 because the RC contains binaries? > > > > > > Vote on the source artifacts only. Clarify that your vote does not apply > to > > the binaries. > > > > Cheers, > > -g > > > -- > Sent from my Mobile device >
