+1. That distinction is important. The ASF, and our projects, release source code.
> On Oct 25, 2018, at 6:39 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Those are "convenience binaries" ... not "binary releases". > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 2:25 AM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> While I agree that binary artifacts are for convenience purposes, if one >> searches our dist folder they will find lots of projects with binary >> releases. >> >> When reviewing binary archives we need to make sure that the license file >> is updated with the shiped dependencies licenses appropriately and that >> they are all compatible with the Apache License (notice file might also >> need to be updated). >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 05:38 Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:25 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> ... >>> >>>> As a reviewer, how am I to vote on this release candidate? >>> >>> >>> You do NOT vote on binary artifacts. Since you cannot release binaries, >> you >>> should not put the Foundation's imprimatur on those artifacts (and as PMC >>> Member, that is what your vote represents). >>> >>> >>>> Should I vote -1 because the RC contains binaries? >>> >>> >>> Vote on the source artifacts only. Clarify that your vote does not apply >> to >>> the binaries. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -g >>> >> -- >> Sent from my Mobile device >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
