As mentor is member of PPMC and IPMC, it could speed up the voting process by getting the mentor involved at the earlier stage. Normally we just wait for the PPMC to do the technical check then we go through the License check in the IPMC vote. But for Zipkin, there are lots of community releases which are built on top of auto tools, so I think it's much safer for us to start a parallel vote both PPMC and IPMC.
Any thoughts? Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 4:54 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > This vote is running concurrent with the above, carrying over 3 > > binding +1 votes from mentors Willem Ning Jiang, Sheng Wu and Andriy > > Redko. > > Given that people can change their vote I would suggest you not do this in > future but wait until the podling vote is over. If an issue was found and the > vote cancelled then IPMC may not be so inclined to vote of future votes, it > also means you’re asking the IPMC to vote without full information on the > outcome of the podling vote. there are no carry over votes here because the > voting on the podling list has not been finished. > > Thanks, > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
