> On Jul 3, 2019, at 12:16 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jul 3, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:28 AM Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi -
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 1, 2019, at 1:30 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz 
>>>> <bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 1:39 AM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> ...I put up suggested text changes for an incubator disclaimer here [1]...
>>>> 
>>>> Basically just adding this, right?
>>>> 
>>>>> Some of the project releases may not follow ASF policy or have
>>>>> incomplete or unknown licensing conditions....
>>>> 
>>>> It works for me but I'd say "incubating project" to be clearer.
>>> 
>>> How is this?
>>> 
>>> “Some of the incubating project’s releases may not be fully compliant with 
>>> ASF policy. For example, releases may have incomplete or unreviewed 
>>> licensing conditions. Known issues will be described on the project’s 
>>> status page."
>> 
>> I would suggest we have a policy where known issues are actually
>> listed in the DISCLAIMER itself. Along the lines of:
>> 
>> "Some of the incubating project’s releases may not be fully compliant
>> with ASF policy. For example, releases may have incomplete or
>> unreviewed licensing conditions. What follows is a list of known
>> issues the project is currently aware of (note that this list, by
>> definition, is likely to be incomplete):”
> 
> -1.
> 
> This only works for issues known before a release is cut. It does NOT WORK if 
> the issue is discovered during the release vote. Why? Because we are trying 
> to allow the release to go through without redoing it and this would require 
> reworking the release.
> 
> I would rather do it outside of the release. Policing the actual DISCLAIMER 
> is not easily feasible and decreases the burden.

Sorry I meant to write increases the burden and not lessens it.

> 
> If this is the decision then it leads to a choice that is worse than the 
> status quo.
> 
>> 
>> I would also suggest we add an explicit note warning our downstream 
>> consumers:
>> 
>> "If you are planning to incorporate this work into your
>> product/project, please be aware that you will need to conduct a
>> thorough licensing review to determine the overall implications of
>> including this work”
> 
> This is a reasonable approach for the usual DISCLAIMER but …
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
>> 
>>>>> ...It also been suggested than any known issues be listed in the 
>>>>> disclaimer...
>>>> 
>>>> I don't think that works as modifying the disclaimer to list issues
>>>> will change the digests of the archive that's being voted on - and
>>>> those shouldn't change IMO.
>>>> 
>>>> As Paul suggests in a different thread I'd go for easy to find tickets
>>>> to describe those changes. The disclaimer might point to
>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/release-issues which in turn points to
>>>> those tickets, keyed by release name and version number. Or something
>>>> like that - a permalink that points to the details.
>>> 
>>> I would suggest that in a revamping of podling status pages that the 
>>> podling can list current issues with each release.
>>> 
>>> The link to that page is easy: 
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/<podling>
>>> 
>>> BTW - I’ve changed my thoughts on a Whimsical version of the status data 
>>> and am planning to put these in as AsciiDoc pages / YML into the 
>>> Incubator’s Git.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -Bertrand
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to