On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:27 AM Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...The compromise which seemed acceptable to most in that thread seems to be 
> to remove “GitHub” from the link...

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 3:46 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> ...The problem is that "fork" means two different things, and that some
> members seem to be interpreting fork in the sense of a project level fork...

Considering this and the Board discussion mentioned in this thread I
think changing the language would work, and also using a nofollow
attribute on the link to GitHub.

I suggest:
a) Changing the language of such banners to "Pull Requests Welcome"
(because "forking" can be misunderstood and due to our fierce
corporate independence principle)
b) Asking our projects to add a "rel=nofollow" attribute on the link to GitHub
c) Asking our projects to make sure the README of their repositories
points to their .apache.org URL

I think this information belongs to
https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs as that's where projects
find the ASF requirements for their websites - this one is not
strictly about branding but it's good to have all this info in one
place.

If we agree on this I suggest that we propose a patch for that page to
trademarks@

-Bertrand

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to