on 2/10/01 1:06 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have analyzed JUnit and feel it doesn't address our needs, nor the > integration testing needs, though we like it's Ant base. What would it take to make JUnit address your needs? I'm tired of hearing people start new projects without also giving details about exactly why they can't do the work to make existing projects more compatible for their needs. thanks, -jon -- If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take your pain to new levels. --Anonymous <http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/> && <http://java.apache.org/turbine/> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Jon Stevens
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Peter Donald
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Doug Davis
- RE: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Gudmundur Hafsteinsson
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Jon Stevens
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Doug Davis
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Jon Stevens
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Sam Ruby
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Jeff Martin
- Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Scott_Boag
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Jon Stevens
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Peter Donald
- Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Doug Davis
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Rob Leland
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Shane_Curcuru
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Sean Kelly
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Jon Stevens
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Ovidiu Predescu
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Paul Russell
- Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Sam Ruby
- RE: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Steve Downey