>What prevent the "JavalinSoft" class from working with the JDK 1.4? >And what prevent you from conditionally bridging the two package, >*if you relly need to*? What's the benefit in settling on the 'standard' logging package if you end up having to include a copy of it (the JavalinSoft version) with every copy of your software? That is, unless it's a superior package to other freely useable/distributable packages, which seems to be in doubt at the moment. I'm sure there are somewhat more messy ways of making this work than I can think of, but the point seems to be that one shouldn't have to. Avi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Paulo Gaspar
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Cedric Berger
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Berin Loritsch
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Jon Stevens
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Cedric Berger
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Kurt Schrader
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Cedric Berger
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Cedric Berger
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Avi Cherry
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Cedric Berger
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Avi Cherry
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Cedric Berger
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Ceki Gülcü
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Cedric Berger
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Conor MacNeill
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Berin Loritsch