Ceki Gülcü wrote: > Cedric, > > If you think that j.u.l has all the features you need then you should > use it. Have you actually looked at the contents of j.u.l? No more than 5 minutes. Again, I'm not trying to say that any logging package is better than any another one, because I don't have this expertise / experience. I was just trying to somewhat balance some strong opinions which have showed up on this list. Cedric --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Jon Stevens
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Cedric Berger
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Kurt Schrader
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Cedric Berger
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Cedric Berger
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Avi Cherry
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Cedric Berger
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Avi Cherry
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Cedric Berger
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Ceki Gülcü
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Cedric Berger
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Conor MacNeill
- Re: Loggers, loggers, all over the place Berin Loritsch