Ceki Gülcü wrote:

> Cedric,
>
> If you think that j.u.l has all the features you need then you should
> use it. Have you actually looked at the contents of j.u.l?

No more than 5 minutes.

Again, I'm not trying to say that any logging package is better than
any another one, because I don't have this expertise / experience.

I was just trying to somewhat balance some strong opinions which
have showed up on this list.

Cedric



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to