On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> Caldera agree with a lot of the concerns expressed by Apache. We would like to > >> see more to be done to protect the interests of open source providers. > > > > Did Caldera understand what they voted for? If they agree with Apache why did > > they vote yes? > > Apparently, Apple, Caldera, and Doug Lea each felt that these issues are > resolvable in the public review.
Which makes sense - given what happened with W3C's public review of the rand issue. The issue is very similar, almost identical - and I hope the solution will be the same ( i.e. enough public comments to make it impossible for this to pass in the current form ). Now the problem is getting enough people to send feedback during the public review - and posting a clear pointer with the address to send comments to and the background informations on the main page ( or on all apache pages ) would be a good start. Slashdot will be another. I believe the 'public comments' are sent to all those who're supposed to vote, and is supposed to have a certain influence, isn't it ? Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
