On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 12:13, Scott Sanders wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ceki Glc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > I never suspected (nor suggested) that commons-logging effort
> > was dishonorable in any way. My contention is that it will
> > make life harder not easier. Nothing more, nothing less.
>
> I think it may make life harder for the commons, Log4J, and LogKit teams,
god no. The avalon group was already using a facade logger long before
commons was for much the same reason commons adopted one. It also makes it
much easier to have a "slim" logging system that just prints out to standard
out or whatever when thats all you need.
> If we have problems with interoperability (and we will), we fix them. Yes,
> someone has to ultimately dictate the logger to use. As a commons
> developer, I do not want to force that choice onto anyone. Let them
> decide.
Well I have got a bug report recently wrt LogKit integration. Apparently you
removed support for it recently in a reorg or it is no longer detected or
something (not sure I didn't really understand) which annoyed a couple of
people. Dunno if this is still relevent though ;)
--
Cheers,
Pete
"There is only one good - knowledge; and one evil - ignorance."
Socrates
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
