On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > [I like "Turbineers". :-) ] > > I am one of them, and I did some discussion about JCS @ ApacheCon with > Martin Poeschl (who seems to do the odd fix to JCS because he uses it in > Torque), another Turbineer. We basically were came to the same > conclusion as robert: > > - JCS is cute and should have a larger exposure > - JCS isn't related at all to Turbine. At most it is related to Torque > - JCS could be moved to db.apache.org but it is not really database > specific > - There is (almost) no resistance to move this project out of Turbine. > > So my vote is > > > ------------------------------------------>8 > > > > (comments here, please) > > > > ------------------------------------------>8 > > [ ] leave it within turbine > > [ ] move it to apache commons > > [X] move it to jakarta commons > > [ ] move it to incubator > > [ ] something else (please specify)... > > -------------------------------------------- > > If JCS really catches on, we can still move it back to Jakarta as > "Jakarta JCS".
This all makes sense to me, and coming from a Turbineer, it's something I would support. It might even provide a path to resolution for what we do with Commons Cache, which is currently in a coma (at best)... -- Martin Cooper > > Regards > Henning > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
