Thanks for the input, but I can't see that fetchmail is able to fetch via ActiveSync?
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Shrivallabh Jagdish Deshmukh < shrivalla...@ivycomptech.com> wrote: > A simpler solution would be to use fetchmail or any such tools with a Cron > job. > > Using James might turn out to be an overkill IMHO. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jens B [mailto:jens.bengts...@gmail.com] > Sent: 18 June 2013 15:09 > To: general@james.apache.org > Subject: Using James to "proxy" a work server > > Hi, > > I'm hoping this list is the right place to ask. > > I am looking to "proxy" my Exchange mail to Gmail to be able to use the > Mailbox app - I am aware that this possibly violates IT policies, so this > is a technical question, not a why and don't do it one ;) > > So, I have a Exchange server that can be accessed remotely on mobile > devices (assuming via ActiveSynch, it's the Exchange option on the iOS). > > I want all mail from this server to end up in my gmail account, but > forwarding is not enabled server side. > > What I wanted to do is to set up a proxy email server that fetches mail > using the mobile protocol from the Exchange server, then allowing gmail to > pull that mail with POP3. > > Would James be the right "proxy" for this? I have researched this a bit, > and it looks to me like I would need to be able to fetch mail with POP3 for > James to support this, which I can't. > > Any thoughts or pointers would be very appreciated. > > thanks, > > Jens > This email and any attachments are confidential, and may be legally > privileged and protected by copyright. If you are not the intended > recipient dissemination or copying of this email is prohibited. If you have > received this in error, please notify the sender by replying by email and > then delete the email completely from your system. Any views or opinions > are solely those of the sender. This communication is not intended to form > a binding contract unless expressly indicated to the contrary and properly > authorised. Any actions taken on the basis of this email are at the > recipient's own risk. >