On 5/24/07, Markus Schmidt-Groettrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, very obvious indeed, wondering why I have not seen it myself. I think it is worth an additional sentence in the J reference or JforC.
Maybe JforC should spell this out in more detail, but we already have http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/dictb.htm whose introduction speaks of adding an extra argument for thy dyadic case, and also hints at the most extreme departure from this concept (where one of the cases has an empty domain). -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
