Just to drive myself into the right direction: Are you speaking of bootdelegation ? Maybe i completely miss the track..?
If so, this was well disussed and finally pointed out here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00157.html (i just refreshed myself yesterday about it, so this is just in time) So anything from java.* must come from the framework (security) and anything other than this must be imported. Just equinox people use Bootdelegation and inject other packages out of thin air if i reall correcly ;-) /Toni -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 17:06:29 +0300 > Von: "Alin Dreghiciu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: "General OPS4J" <general@lists.ops4j.org> > Betreff: Pax Runner and system packages > Hi guys, > As some may already know in pax runner we are in control of the system > packages aka packages that are exported by the system bundle. In runner ng > I > would like to (already did a part) to have an option of what packages to > be > used, option that defaults to the jdk in use. What I want is that you > could > in this way say what are your expected execution environments so you could > test if all the required packages are there. Now my question: how would > you > vote for the packages included per execution environment: > A: is a standard set of packages (if I could find such a set) > B: stuff all the packages we find in the jvm > > A has the advantage that you are pretty sure that will work in any > platform > and B has the advantage that you should not bother about adding the extra > packages you need from JVM to the class path as it will be needed for A. > Anyhow, I suppose that this set of packages is quite restricted. > > My vote is: A+1 B-1. _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
