Very good link Toni. Thanx. Didn't answer my question but was a god read. Alin
On 9/3/07, Alin Dreghiciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Boot delegation is quite clear. This is the java.*. > > Is also not about org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation (this may be another > point of discussion since right runner does nothing about) > > > Is about org.osgi.framework.systemPackages which identifies what packages > are exported by the system bundle. Usually you will find out that the > regardles the framework, system bundle exports all the javax.* and org.* and > some more packages. > > > Alin > PS. I will check also the link you sent. > > On 9/3/07, Toni Menzel < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Just to drive myself into the right direction: Are you speaking of > > bootdelegation ? Maybe i completely miss the track..? > > > > If so, this was well disussed and finally pointed out here: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/osgi- [EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00157.html > > > > (i just refreshed myself yesterday about it, so this is just in time) > > > > So anything from java.* must come from the framework (security) and > > anything other than this must be imported. Just equinox people use > > Bootdelegation and inject other packages out of thin air if i reall correcly > > ;-) > > > > /Toni > > > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > > Datum: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 17:06:29 +0300 > > > Von: "Alin Dreghiciu" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > An: "General OPS4J" < general@lists.ops4j.org> > > > Betreff: Pax Runner and system packages > > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > As some may already know in pax runner we are in control of the system > > > > > packages aka packages that are exported by the system bundle. In > > runner ng > > > I > > > would like to (already did a part) to have an option of what packages > > to > > > be > > > used, option that defaults to the jdk in use. What I want is that you > > > could > > > in this way say what are your expected execution environments so you > > could > > > test if all the required packages are there. Now my question: how > > would > > > you > > > vote for the packages included per execution environment: > > > A: is a standard set of packages (if I could find such a set) > > > B: stuff all the packages we find in the jvm > > > > > > A has the advantage that you are pretty sure that will work in any > > > platform > > > and B has the advantage that you should not bother about adding the > > extra > > > packages you need from JVM to the class path as it will be needed for > > A. > > > Anyhow, I suppose that this set of packages is quite restricted. > > > > > > My vote is: A+1 B-1. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > general mailing list > > general@lists.ops4j.org > > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
