Exactly, those are the lists I'm looking for. But unfortunately I can't find them. may be I will ask PeterK about. Alin
On 9/3/07, Toni Menzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ok, with regards to systemPackages i recall there is some environment > profile in the spec that clearly lists the packages to be exported on any > profile. > So there is one for all desktop JDKs, a midp profile and others.. not sure > if there is room for interpretation ? > (maybe i am wrong again - no spec here ;-) > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > Datum: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 17:48:01 +0300 > > Von: "Alin Dreghiciu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > An: "General OPS4J" <general@lists.ops4j.org> > > Betreff: Re: Pax Runner and system packages > > > Boot delegation is quite clear. This is the java.*. > > > > Is also not about org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation (this may be another > > point of discussion since right runner does nothing about) > > > > > > Is about org.osgi.framework.systemPackages which identifies what > packages > > are exported by the system bundle. Usually you will find out that the > > regardles the framework, system bundle exports all the javax.* and org.* > > and > > some more packages. > > > > > > Alin > > PS. I will check also the link you sent. > > > > On 9/3/07, Toni Menzel < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Just to drive myself into the right direction: Are you speaking of > > > bootdelegation ? Maybe i completely miss the track..? > > > > > > If so, this was well disussed and finally pointed out here: > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00157.html > > > > > > (i just refreshed myself yesterday about it, so this is just in time) > > > > > > So anything from java.* must come from the framework (security) and > > > anything other than this must be imported. Just equinox people use > > > Bootdelegation and inject other packages out of thin air if i reall > > correcly > > > ;-) > > > > > > /Toni > > > > > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > > > Datum: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 17:06:29 +0300 > > > > Von: "Alin Dreghiciu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > An: "General OPS4J" < general@lists.ops4j.org> > > > > Betreff: Pax Runner and system packages > > > > > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > As some may already know in pax runner we are in control of the > system > > > > packages aka packages that are exported by the system bundle. In > > runner > > > ng > > > > I > > > > would like to (already did a part) to have an option of what > packages > > to > > > > be > > > > used, option that defaults to the jdk in use. What I want is that > you > > > > could > > > > in this way say what are your expected execution environments so you > > > could > > > > test if all the required packages are there. Now my question: how > > would > > > > you > > > > vote for the packages included per execution environment: > > > > A: is a standard set of packages (if I could find such a set) > > > > B: stuff all the packages we find in the jvm > > > > > > > > A has the advantage that you are pretty sure that will work in any > > > > platform > > > > and B has the advantage that you should not bother about adding the > > > extra > > > > packages you need from JVM to the class path as it will be needed > for > > A. > > > > Anyhow, I suppose that this set of packages is quite restricted. > > > > > > > > My vote is: A+1 B-1. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > general mailing list > > > general@lists.ops4j.org > > > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
