On 2/13/06, Mikeal Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Was this end-user base the kind of users targeted in 0.1 releases of > Chandler or Cosmo, or for that matter any other successful open > source project?
not for cosmo, and i sure wouldn't have wanted to suggest that cosmo 0.1 was production quality. at the same time, it would have been nice to have some sort of professional looking face. the cosmo wiki is poorly organized and poorly written, and with that the only public face of the project, we look like amateurs and slobs, imo. there's a big difference between putting up an attractive page with some colors and organization and telling the world that our software is ready for my grandmother to use. i think we should give those who show early interest in our stuff a little credit for being able to tell the difference. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
