Would it make more sense to include the commits list in with the other lists per project, ie. the cosmo-commits would group with cosmo-dev, etc.
Rather than lumping all the commits together? Pieter On 3/13/06, Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Katie Capps Parlante wrote: > > Hi Ted, > > > > I'm assuming that archive links like this one will continue to work: > > http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/dev/2006-February/005295.html > > > > I'm also assuming that you are going to change the website and any > > appropriate wiki pages: > > http://www.osafoundation.org/mailing_lists.htm > Both of those tasks are on our list of things that need to happen: > <http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Journal/TedLeung20060222>. > > Also, Pieter pointed out that we should probably rename the commits > lists for consistency, so > > minimally we'd do > > commits -> commits-chandler > > Something more consistent would be: > > commits -> chandler-commits > commits-cosmo -> cosmo-commits > commits-scooby -> scooby-commits > commits-pyicu -> pyicu-commits > commits-vobject-> vobject-commits > commits-zanshin -> zanshin-commits > > This seems more logical to me, but we haven't discussed this > previously. Does anyone object to this renaming? In particular, Andi, > Grant, or Jeffrey? > > Ted > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > > Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
