Philippe Bossut wrote:
Pieter Hartsook wrote:
Would it make more sense to include the commits list in with the other
lists per project, ie. the cosmo-commits would group with cosmo-dev,
etc.
Rather than lumping all the commits together?
I like to keep the commits and discussion separated. I guess that some
people may want to check the discussions without being annoyed by the
commits. Not sure if it's standard in other OS projects but wx does
this for instance.
FWIW, I filter commits and discussions in separate imap folders and
review them separately and like to continue to do this easily.
I think what Pieter is asking for is the second option that I proposed:
keep the commits lists separate, but change the naming so that the name
of the project is first and not second. For mail readers that sort
foldernames alphabetically, this puts the commits list with the project
list instead of clustering all the commits lists together.
Is that right Pieter?
Ted
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
