>>> hen they selected George W for the second time ;) >> Ok why do you want to move Axiom out from Axis2 , because it has a big >> advantage when it is there in WS than in Axis2. > > Deepal, so just so I understand - are you saying you *don't* want to > keep Axiom with Axis2? Yes we need to keep Axiom inside Axis2 I mean as a subproject .What I mentioned was once we move Axiom as a separate subproject , we had a number of good out comes. - Visibility increased - Project other than WS started to use that. > >> My concern is , Axis2 does not get what it is supposed to get. It is >> just stay inside something called WS. While some other Web service >> project acting as TLP. > > What exactly is axis2 to "supposed to get" that its not getting. Dims > feels that the community is sleeping (paraphrasing) and thinks that > going TLP will change that. You seem to think that there's other stuff > we're spsed to get - please indicate what that is? Axis2 should not hide under WS , it has to be more than that. For example if I want to find some of the good project in company X what I should do is I go to that home page of company X and see whats there. However the probability of going inside and inside and check to see whether there are any more project is very less. Well I am talking about my self , but I believe I am not the only person doing that in this world. > >> I am sorry I do not want to rename WS into something other than Axis2. >> If we are going to rename then that should be into Axis2 (which include >> both java and c). > > So again, what does s/ws/axis2/g buy us? Visibility , and users tend to believe that Axis2 is not yet another sub project in Axis2. At the moment it has an unnecessary wrapper called WS around Axis2 , IMO which is not needed.
Deepal > > Sanjiva. -- Thank you! http://blogs.deepal.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
