Hi Hiram and thanks,

As felCat3 ensGene refers to version 62, and I downloaded the cDNA data of
ensembl version 62, it is reasonable that there are no contradictions. Yet,
in the examples we discussed, it is not clear how it is possible to map
specific regions in the complete cDNA to specific regions in the scaffold,
as the sizes do not match (e.g. I would like to be able to say that
the coordinates 11000-11102 in a scaffold are mapped to coordinates 500-600,
in the complete cDNA sequence).

Best,
Assaf


On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Hiram Clawson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Good Morning Assaf:
>
> You can fetch the mRNA sequence for these genes from the genome browser.
> Click through on the genes in the display and select mRNA sequence.
>
> Some of the N's you are removing are actually in the mRNA sequence.
> From the cDNA sequence you gave me, I find exactly the same sequence
> in the mRNA sequence from the genome browser, counting the sequence:
>
> Your cDNA:
> #seq                     len     A       C       G       T       N
> ENSFCAT00000010563      5409    904     813     982     451     2259
>
> The mRNA from the genome browser:
> #seq                    len     A       C       G       T       N
> ENSFCAT00000010563      1671    500     405     551     215     0
> ENSFCAT00000010563      242     58      71      62      51      0
> ENSFCAT00000010563      1267    346     337     369     185     30
> total                   3180    904     813     982     451     30
>
> Note the 30 N's in the third bit of mRNA sequence.  The amount of ACGT is
> exactly the same.
>
> Your cDNA:
> [hiram@okazaki /tmp] faCount Felis_catus.CAT.62.cdna.**examples
> #seq                    len     A       C       G       T       N
> ENSFCAT00000005360      675     139     105     134     108     189
>
> The mRNA from the genome browser:
> #seq                    len     A       C       G       T       N
> ENSFCAT00000005360      165     49      44      38      34      0
> ENSFCAT00000005360      321     90      61      96      74      0
> total                   486     139     105     134     108     0
>
> The amount of ACGT is exactly the same.  The extra N's are only in the
> cDNA.
>
>
> Your cDNA:
> #seq                     len     A       C       G       T       N
> ENSFCAT00000015608      2295    416     472     406     388     613
>
> The mRNA from the genome browser:
> #seq                    len     A       C       G       T       N
> ENSFCAT00000015608      493     103     126     142     122     0
> ENSFCAT00000015608      1625    288     261     239     224     613
> ENSFCAT00000015608      177     25      85      25      42      0
> total                   2295    416     472     406     388     613
>
> The N sequence in this case is the same in the cDNA and the mRNA,
> with exactly the same ACGT sequence.
>
> --Hiram
>
>
> asas asasa wrote:
>
>> Hi Hiram,
>>
>> My problem is how to know which part of the cDNA is mapped to which part
>> of
>> the scaffold.
>> In fact this problem exists also in the main site, in the case of felCat3
>> for example.
>> Attached the cDNAs of 3 examples downloaded in ensembl 62 ftp. The exons
>> starts/ends appear in the ensGene for  felCat3. Accordingly:
>>
>> * the gene ENSFCAT00000010563 is mapped to 3 scaffolds and the sum of all
>> mapped exon sizes is 3180 bp, while the total size of the cDNA is 5409 bp.
>> After removing the Ns we get 3150 bp, which is still not equal.
>>
>> * For ENSFCAT00000005360 the exons sum is 486 bp, while the cDNA is 675,
>> and
>> only after removing the Ns we get 486 bp.
>>
>> * in ENSFCAT00000015608 the total size of cDNA is 2295 bp including Ns
>> block, which is equal to the sum of exons.
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Assaf
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Genome maillist  -  [email protected]
https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome

Reply via email to