Now wait a minute, not everyone has $100k to spend on a brand new
laptop. I'm a student, and I have a single computer to last me through
two years of highschool and and at least a few years of college, and
there's no way I'm going to screw up my computer without some
insurance, ok? Before I run anything on this machine, I'm going to
make sure that I'm still under warrantee, whether the parts are user
servicable or not. Now if you call that being silly, then that's your
choice, but it's my choice if I want to be cautious, even overly so.

On that note, I did buck up and run memtest86+ from a Ubuntu livecd,
and after several loops (about 1h 30 min of straight testing) I didn't
get a single error. It was on Test #6 when I stopped, so I think the
memory's chill. Besides, as I said before, when I run anything GUI
(enlightement, right now), it's fine. I just have to jump in and out
of terminal really quickly. The fact that it likes to crash after
starting x server twice makes me think I might have a few damaged
portions on my harddrive. Does that sound about right? Of course, that
sounds like it could be a kernel issue too. If I can figure out how to
"downgrade" my kernel, maybe that will solve it.

I just clicked the "<<plain text" button and the setting has held for
this entire thread. Come to think of it, I may have actually converted
it back to Rich Text a few weeks back.

-Peter

On 5/15/07, Peter Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



----- Original Message ----
From: Peter Davoust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 7:11:20 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Gentoo crashing?

I know it doesn't actually burn the cpu, but I'd rather not cook any
components if I don't have to. From what I know of torture tests, they run
the cpu so hot it starts making computational errors, am I right? It still
makes me nervous. I was hoping to be able to fix the issue just by
recompiling my kernel, but no such luck. I'll mess with it some more and see
what I can do. Can you give me any advice as to what I should to to a) not
violate my warrantee and b) avoid killing my computer as much as possible?
Could it just be something with my Gentoo install? I guess that's a stupid
question; I've had this problem on an older computer, but it was a Desktop
and it was much easier to swap components without messing up my warrantee.
So if it were a hardware problem, wouldn't you think that suse 10.2 would
have run into it as well? I used to run 10.2 (used to as in 3 days ago) for
hours on end without any problems at all. I agree that Gentoo can run the
computer harder, but that doesn't quite click.

-Peter



You're being silly. Software torture tests are not going to kill your
hardware. Just run them and see what you get. Memtest will give you the
address where the error occured, and I've always been able to determine
which stick was bad from that, using a little deductive reasoning (I usually
verify by testing the sticks alone, but so far I've not been wrong).

As for voiding your warranty, memory and the hard drive are typically
considered user-servicable parts. In fact, most of the time if either of
those are the problem they'll just send you the parts and you'll have to
replace them yourself anyway.

More on torturing hardware: really, the only component that's at all
vulnerable to this is the hard drive, simply because it's a mechanical
device, but it will take an absurdly long time to do any actual damage. I
used to test hard drives for video servers (think Tivo, but starting at
$100k). We tried a wide variety of drive testing suites, but it turned out
none of them ran the drives harder than our normal application. A surprising
number of the oldest version of our product are still running, on the
original drives, after over 10 years, in situations that are very demanding
(like serving multiple channels for DirecTV). So, really, stop being so
paranoid about software torture tests. It is a complete myth that you can
ruin your hardware by running them.



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to