On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 13:47, Mike Frysinger wrote: > umm ACCEPT_LICENSE has been pointed out in other threads (specifically the one > where the id/EULA violation was originally discussed) and can be found in a > semi-old bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17367 > if you mean to say that the variable actually does something, then you'd be > wrong ... there is no code behind that variable atm ... > -mike
I have ACCEPT_LICENSE="SAVAGE" in make.conf, and emerge savagedemo does not show a license or force me to agree to anything. Thus I would say the lack of interactivity is preserved and there is indeed code behind it, unless some other force I'm unaware of is at work.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
