On 11/04/03 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 13:47, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > umm ACCEPT_LICENSE has been pointed out in other threads > > (specifically the one where the id/EULA violation was originally > > discussed) and can be found in a semi-old bug: > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17367 > > if you mean to say that the variable actually does something, then > > you'd be wrong ... there is no code behind that variable atm ... > > -mike > > I have ACCEPT_LICENSE="SAVAGE" in make.conf, and emerge savagedemo > does not show a license or force me to agree to anything. Thus I would > say the lack of interactivity is preserved and there is indeed code > behind it, unless some other force I'm unaware of is at work.
There is some code in the eutils eclass, but nothing in portage itself. Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
