> > It seems to me that consistency would demand the same thing for > *-update. I've been in a situation where I've needed to run > SOMETHING-update before, but couldn't remember what "SOMETHING" was. > Being able to tab complete update-<tab> would be great! > > Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> I just had an idea (how rare, eh?) and I wanted to see what other >> people thought of it. >> >> What if we renamed all the *-config tools to config-* (gcc-config, >> distcc-config, java-config, etc. would move to config-gcc, >> config-distcc, config-java, etc.)? >> >> This would allow people trying to configure anything to simply type >> config-<tab> and get a listing of what was available.
I had imagined renaming anything that was *-update to config-* also for consistency. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
