On Tuesday 18 November 2003 00:09, Markus Nigbur wrote: > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:18:09 -0500 (EST) > > "donnie berkholz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I had imagined renaming anything that was *-update to config-* also > > for consistency. > > Ehrm, IMHO *-update should be scripts that don't need any user > interaction, like env-update or opengl-update (and yes, etc-update is an > exception; even so it should really be called etc-config. ;)
Umm, in a sense opengl-update does need interaction - even if it's only passing command line parameters to the proggy. env-update is a different story; you just run it and it does it's thing. Personally, I would feel that opengl-update would be a good candidate to switch to config-. I can't think of too many that would fall into the update- class (using the "non-interactive" definition), but perhaps things like fixpackages? Regards, Jason -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
