On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:32:39 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 November 2003 00:09, Markus Nigbur wrote: > > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:18:09 -0500 (EST) > > > > "donnie berkholz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I had imagined renaming anything that was *-update to config-* > > > also for consistency. > > > > Ehrm, IMHO *-update should be scripts that don't need any user > > interaction, like env-update or opengl-update (and yes, etc-update > > is an exception; even so it should really be called etc-config. ;) > > Umm, in a sense opengl-update does need interaction - even if it's > only passing command line parameters to the proggy. That's what i mean. User interaction is more than just specifiying some commandline options. Those could also be specified by a default file, a script calling the *-update script or simply default values. User interaction starts when the user actively has to do some stuff when running the script (as with etc-update). -- Markus -- Markus Nigbur Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
