Spider wrote: [Sat Nov 22 2003, 04:43:10PM EST] > in a case where you can choose to accept either the MPL or the GPL for > example, the license should be > LICENSE="GPL | MPL" > > And if its for example either released as FPL (Foo package License ) or > GPL+ LGPL parts, it should be : > LICENSE="FPL | (GPL LGPL)" > > This is the logic that "makes sense" for me. in a case where its > multiple licensed, you have to agree to all such licenses, or it won't > match.
This is fine with me, and I can go ahead and fix the colorschemes package. I guess this would necessitate a rev bump if ACCEPT_LICENSES were implemented so that users would be properly informed, but since ACCEPT_LICENSES isn't implemented yet, I won't bump the rev. I suppose that other packages can be fixed as we go along, but this information needs to be added to the developer's guide / ebuild-writing guide / skel.ebuild. Swift? Before we go any further, does this warrant a GLEP or can we implement as a bug-fix to 17367? It seems to me that all voices have been supportive so far, even if there are different opinions (/me waves to Matt Kennedy) regarding free/non-free software in Gentoo. Aron -- Aron Griffis Gentoo Linux Developer (alpha / ia64 / ruby / vim) Key fingerprint = E3B6 8734 C2D6 B5E5 AE76 FB3A 26B1 C5E3 2010 4EB0
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
