-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 27 November 2003 04:12 pm, Jason Wever wrote: > My $0.02 is that if this gets implemented, it should be put in so that the > default behavior is like portage is now, Since Portage as it is right now doesn't pay any attention to licenses, its legality could be questioned (as with the games issue before?) > and if you choose to restrict > yourself to only free software or other licensing scheme, you can make the > necessary changes yourself. Otherwise you will have a ton of users asking > "why can't i emerge package foo?", or filing bugs because of this, etc. If Portage displays a clear enough message, there shouldn't be a problem with this... > >From a support perspective, if this gets implemented, I'm forwarding all > of these questions, bugs, etc to the "free and only free" software folks. > Please dont' take away one "freedom" for another. As long as there is an option (editing the ACCEPT_LICENSES), there is no freedom being removed. - -- Luke-Jr Developer, Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/xiP7Zl/BHdU+lYMRAuo5AJ4jjBD+GVz+jdH5dXB7PXbOcmfpRQCfUKdo IOKkz00clG7LuanKt4NEYEY= =2Bgc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
