On 11/23/03 Jason Stubbs wrote: > Hello all, > > I've done a small patch which checks for licenses but have come across > an issue while testing. Take the following: > > xfree contains LICENSE="X11 MSttfEULA" > qt contains LICENSE="QPL-1.0 | GPL-2" > > What other lexical forms are there? The ebuild howto doesn't even > mention the above construct. Will I find something like "(LIC1 LIC2) | > LIC3"? > > Most importantly, though, does portage already contain the code to > parse these somewhere?
So before we can go ahead and implement this the following points have to be cleared: - formal syntax and semantic of the LICENSE variable - What should be the default for ACCEPT_LICENSES, this is probably a point for the managers meeting - How should portage handle packages with unaccepted licenses Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
