On Friday 28 November 2003 22:00, brett holcomb wrote: > So assume we make it so the rest of us have to do the work > to make Gentoo usable - will it stop with just having to > modify /etc/make.conf or once that is achieved what's next > - eliminate packages that are "immorally licensed" but are > necessary to make Gentoo usable because we don't believe > in the licenses . It appears choice is good except when > it doesn't agree with a political philosophy.
What are you so angry about? No one is talking about making it difficult for users to use "non-free" software. We're just trying to make it easy for the average user to protect him/herself legally. I haven't heard much of a mention of morals for a while. Most of the talk has just been about what would be the best defaults - BUT whatever is decided for the defaults it definately wont be difficult to change. And what's with your concern about removing "immorally licensed" packages from portage? Only one person mentioned that and was even shot down by people that don't use "immorally licensed" software. Jason -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
