I guess my concern is that Gentoo has struck an excellent balance between keeping the free software philosophy and making a distro that is usuable for cases when commerical or non-free software has to be used. Now we have people who want to Debianize Gentoo by at least forcing us to do things to use "immoral licenses". If all the free software people are so hot to worry about pure systems then let them be the ones who have to do the work - don't force it on us. If that's not acceptable then use Debian.


Having served my time as a windows Admin/user/maintainer/etc I am a strong supporter of free software but this inane insistance on creating a "pure distro free from immoral licenses" is going to kill the acceptance of Linux. People who have to make things work aren't going to put up with it and will scratch distros like that off the list of considerations. Do that to Gentoo and a lot of users will find another distro.


So assume we make it so the rest of us have to do the work to make Gentoo usable - will it stop with just having to modify /etc/make.conf or once that is achieved what's next - eliminate packages that are "immorally licensed" but are necessary to make Gentoo usable because we don't believe in the licenses . It appears choice is good except when it doesn't agree with a political philosophy.

On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 03:40:15 +0000
 Luke-Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 28 November 2003 12:20 am, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
But many others would and do accept them. You want us to jump through
hoops to maintain what we have now so you don't have to.
Adding a single line to make.conf is hardly jumping through hoops, especially considering that people should consider changes to make.conf when upgrading Portage anyway...
- -- Luke-Jr
Developer, Gentoo Linux
http://www.gentoo.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)


iD8DBQE/xsOjZl/BHdU+lYMRAt0NAJ4oefrRqybVZHwDVAZpJsXzs045nQCeMb1I
pYWnKNaEm1FlMIMR+q8bgtU=
=AK0u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Reply via email to