Having served my time as a windows Admin/user/maintainer/etc I am a strong supporter of free software but this inane insistance on creating a "pure distro free from immoral licenses" is going to kill the acceptance of Linux. People who have to make things work aren't going to put up with it and will scratch distros like that off the list of considerations. Do that to Gentoo and a lot of users will find another distro.
So assume we make it so the rest of us have to do the work to make Gentoo usable - will it stop with just having to modify /etc/make.conf or once that is achieved what's next - eliminate packages that are "immorally licensed" but are necessary to make Gentoo usable because we don't believe in the licenses . It appears choice is good except when it doesn't agree with a political philosophy.
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 03:40:15 +0000 Luke-Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Friday 28 November 2003 12:20 am, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:But many others would and do accept them. You want us to jump throughAdding a single line to make.conf is hardly jumping through hoops, especially considering that people should consider changes to make.conf when upgrading Portage anyway...
hoops to maintain what we have now so you don't have to.
- -- Luke-Jr
Developer, Gentoo Linux
http://www.gentoo.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/xsOjZl/BHdU+lYMRAt0NAJ4oefrRqybVZHwDVAZpJsXzs045nQCeMb1I pYWnKNaEm1FlMIMR+q8bgtU= =AK0u -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
