> Once you decide to dump CVS, backward compability and user familiarity are > removed as relevant problems. What are the other obstacles to using > Subversion or arch
The last time we seriously tested svn we found that svn choked on a repository the size of the portage tree. The problem w/ arch (and w/ metacvs, which would be my preference), is that neither system has a good migration utility from cvs. The history of changes that is kept in our cvs tree is extremely valuable, and thus any new system that does not allow us to keep that history is a non-starter. -g2boojum- -- Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
