On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 13:07:01 -0600 Matthew Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, but dev-lisp is already chockers with common lisp stuff, so that > won't do. > What about a dev-commonlisp category then? Like there is app-emacs (resp. app-vim) for emacs (resp. vim) packages, whereas other editors goes to app-editors. -- TGL. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
