Interactively merge the two and you should be all set.

Don.

On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 02:48:25PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> recently, i re-emerged 'baselayout',
> which caused a set of candidates to be created for 'etc-update'.
> most were innocuous or easily understood,
> but one was for  /etc/fstab , which seems both dangerous & unjustified.
> 
> my existing  /etc/fstab  is (omitting comment lines):
> 
>   /dev/hda1            /boot        ext2       noauto,noatime          1 2
>   /dev/hda2            none         swap       sw                      0 0
>   /dev/hda3            /            reiserfs   notail,noatime          1 1
>   /dev/hda5            /usr/local   reiserfs   notail,noatime          1 2
>   /dev/hda6            /home        reiserfs   notail,noatime          1 2
>   /dev/hda7            /ya          reiserfs   notail,noatime          1 2
>   /dev/hda8            /yb          reiserfs   noauto,notail,noatime   1 2
>   /dev/hda9            /z           reiserfs   notail,noatime          1 2
>   /dev/cdroms/cdrom0   /mnt/cdrom   iso9660    noauto,ro               0 0
>   none                 /proc        proc       defaults                0 0
>   none                 /dev/shm     tmpfs      defaults                0 0
> 
> the new one created by 'baselayout' ( ._cfg0000_fstab ) is :
> 
>   /dev/BOOT            /boot        ext2       noauto,noatime          1 1
>   /dev/ROOT            /            xfs        noatime                 0 0
>   /dev/SWAP            none         swap       sw                      0 0
>   /dev/cdroms/cdrom0   /mnt/cdrom   iso9660    noauto,ro               0 0
>   none                 /proc        proc       defaults                0 0
>   none                 /dev/shm     tmpfs      defaults                0 0
> 
> NB esp that  /  is shown as 'xfs' a/a the correct 'reiserfs'.
> 
> why does 'baselayout' want to rewrite  /etc/fstab  at all ?
> why does it want to misidentify the type of file system ?
> 
> this looks like something which deserves attention & possible remedy.
> 
> -- 
> ========================,,============================================
> SUPPORT     ___________//___,  Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban & Community Studies
> TRANSIT    `-O----------O---'  University of Toronto
> 
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

-- 
"I told all four that there were going to be some times where we don't agree
with each other.  But that's OK.  If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck
of a lot easier -- just as long as I'm the dictator."

George W. Bush
December 18, 2000
Comment made during first trip to Washington, D.C. after winning the
presidency.

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to