On Wednesday 09 March 2005 06:09 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 16:57 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 March 2005 04:21 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > What about the libconf project ? Can't we still put that to use > > > somehow (sorry, don't know the details anymore of it) to solve this > > > issue? > > > > what do you mean 'still' ? when have we ever used it ? > > Never, but it was planned, thus the 'still'
ive never heard of such a plan :) besides, libconf sounds like just another item that would clutter up the portage requirements ... but then again, i dont know what the original intentions were ... -mike -- [email protected] mailing list
