On Thursday 31 March 2005 08:17 am, Diego "Flameeyes" Petten� wrote: > I know this is there also for compatibility, but this makes sys-libs/pam > ebuild very bloated as for now, and still I don't know a reason to have it > there.
if you read pam-0.78-r2 and do a search in bugzilla, you'll see that pam_console is no longer on by default some people actually do want it, so ripping it out isnt very nice ;) -mike -- [email protected] mailing list
