On Thursday 31 March 2005 08:34 am, Diego "Flameeyes" Petten� wrote: > > some people actually do want it, so ripping it out isnt very nice ;) > > Well, having it as an external ebuild sys-libs/pam_console (or > sys-pam/pam_console, but that's another story), will also save the users > from enabling pam_console not knowing what that is.
that doesnt make any difference ... whether the user puts 'pam_console' into their USE or they `emerge pam_console`, they know what they're getting themselves into if pam_console is giving you a hard time on *BSD, then just use.mask it :P -mike -- [email protected] mailing list
