-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Aron Griffis wrote:
Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:[Tue Jun 07 2005, 05:32:31PM EDT]
I also vote for alpha. I would like to see some indication of
maintainer arch in metadata too, but in general agree with the
policy of if one arch stabilises then we can assume that is the
maintainer arch.
Whoa, careful there. It's not a policy and it's not even
a recommendation. I believe there are arch teams that will
automatically stable a package after it has been ~arch for a period of
time. They will break your assumption.
Agreed, the PPC team is very good at arbitrarily marking things stable
whenever they feel like it, and often times before the maintainer does.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCpwQ6dKvgdVioq28RAkWIAKC2EgL3Kw4VxUmjPrSDh6TwHIMqrgCfcL9e
4nXZ+A/KSwTcRnWVONy4K8I=
=bxSK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
