On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:19:38 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Thursday 18 August 2005 12:09 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: | > On Thursday 18 August 2005 17:55, Mike Frysinger wrote: | > > considering the number of packages that use pmake, why do you | > > want an eclass for it ? i'd say just put the logic in the | > > ebuilds themselves | > | > Add all the ones we use on G/FBSD overlay, and the count increase :) | > The eclass is currently in place for G/FBSD overlay only, but as | > someday we'll merge into tree... | | ok, but then you still have the fact that you're writting an eclass | for a single function ... isnt that the point of eutils ?
No! There's too much crap in eutils already. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgp4eTCF5OPcS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
