Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 22:25 -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> 
>>Kurt Lieber wrote: [Sat Nov 19 2005, 04:42:41PM CST]
>>
>>>On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:06:15PM +0000 or thereabouts, Kurt Lieber wrote:
>>>If the requirement is for r/o CVS access to the same CVS server that the
>>>pure-blooded developers use (sorry, couldn't resist) then it may require
>>>upgrades to our existing server and/or purchasing a new server.  
>>
>>What about authenticated viewcvs on the live CVS server instead?  Back
>>when we had a live viewcvs I used to use it all the time for doing
>>exactly what the ATs want to do now, and I assume that viewcvs puts much
>>less load on the server than a CVS pull does.  
>>
>>In any event, do we need a new server anyway?  We actually do have some
>>money that could be spent on such things, and the CVS server is really
>>high on the list of for which I, personally, would be more than willing
>>to spend it.
>>
>>-g2boojum-
> 
> 
> If we were able to purchase hardware then we might as well make it the
> anon cvs/svn server, no keys/auth are needed then and simple aliases
> would suffice on toucan maintained by the AT leads.

I currently have hardware for an anon cvs/svn server, just no time to
implement currently. I was hoping to get to this in the next few months
time permitting of course. I do not want anon cvs/svn on our live server
at all. Any implementation of such service will need to be on separate
dedicated boxes. I haven't worked out the details for 'live' data, but
the possibilities are there I believe for part of it.

We already have a viewcvs site that updates every 30 minutes (or maybe
an hour, I don't quite remember) that's in testing currently. Check out
viewcvstest.g.o if you're curious. To me the cvs/svn server should only
be doing that, nothing more. For now, i think the dedicated rsync server
is the best route that will accomplish the needs of the ATs. (which I
have a server for also). Until we get an official anon cvs/svn service
implemented, this is the best infra can do.

-- 
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager

---
GPG Public Key:  <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1  4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742

ramereth/irc.freenode.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to