9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:

>> 
>> Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be tied to a USE= flag?
>> If so should it be a 'no*certs' flag or a USE=cacerts ?

> USE=cacerts sounds the proper course of action to me.

NOT until use-based deps are in place, plzktnxbye!!! Don't break the damned
realplayer thing again.

-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature ;)

Attachment: pgpsEZgc6Hws7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to