Andrea Barisani wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:55 +0100, Andrea Barisani wrote:
>>
>>>Regarding the inclusion of ca-certificates as a PDEPEND (yeah a brief
>>>exchange of emails already happened on -dev but since it's not so easy to
>>>track it I'm lagging behind on this) I would like to express that I really
>>>don't like the fact that we are "trusting" cacert.org certs (among others)
>>>without providing it as a choice.
>>>
>>>Despite all the political views that we can throw in favour of a "cacert.org
>>>are trying to make the SSL certs world less evil" argument this is some major
>>>policy that we are supporting and it shouldn't be taken that lightly (I don't
>>>remember such a major confrontation about this) and I really don't think this
>>>should be a default policy but rather user's choice. Technically cacert.org
>>>is not a recognized CA in the "proper" way (and don't point that a proper CA
>>>is a lame concept and a snake oil thing..this is not the point).
>>
>>>[CCing [EMAIL PROTECTED] because this concerns the team as well imho.]
>>>
>>>Just my 2 eurocent.
>>>
>>>P.S.
>>>I know that firefox doesn't trust /etc/ssl/certs by default, dunno about 
>>>konqueror. The point is still relevant though.
>>
>>
>>Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be tied to a USE= flag?
>>If so should it be a 'no*certs' flag or a USE=cacerts ?
> 
> 
> USE=cacerts sounds the proper course of action to me.

I was just `emerge world -vDatu --newuse` on some ~x86 boxen and I saw the new 
(at least to me)
cacert ebuild getting pulled. Although, I support cacert.org and use it 
occasionally, I also think
making it the default is a bit too quick for now. Making it a useflag might be 
better.

Are there any other packages like cacert now? Didn't see any, but time will 
tell.
Might be a better solution to have a more general ebuild that installs CA certs 
and it will have
different (local) useflags.

Just my 2 non-dev Japanese yen :-)

Kalin.
-- 
|[ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ]|
+-> http://ThinRope.net/ <-+
|[ ______________________ ]|
-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to