Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Lance Albertson wrote: > | What if instead of having proj/en we did herd/en on www? Of course, that > | doesn't help the whole "GuideXML is hard" bit. I like the idea of using > | RST, but it doesn't seem very scalable at this time. Maybe, instead of > | that, we created some kind of development site for herds (maybe > | herds.g.o). Could be a place where herds put up status updates, specific > | docs, draft docs, etc. Once things get established on that site, docs > | could get moved to GDP if it were logical to do. > > Really every herd should be either part of a project or in the process > of creating a new one for themselves by now. There's no excuse, since > the block on creating new projects disappeared.
The question I ask is ... does every herd have a project it fits under? I doubt it. And if it doesn't, is it really considered a project? Or is that just a generic name given now? I guess a see a distinction between herds and projects that our current documentation url layout doesn't cover it well. To me, it should have its own herd/fooherd layout (example being www.gentoo.org/herd/en/netmon). Otherwise you're going to confuse our users into thinking that herds are projects when they're really just herds. Granted, some herds may be just a project, but I'm mainly after the herds that have no real project to fit under. I understand the block was lifted for projects, but that doesn't mean herds should all should fit underneath proj/. I think we should open up a similar space just for herds. -- Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
