"Fernando J. Pereda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 01:42:40PM -0700, Ryan Phillips wrote: > > cogito > > - Not practical > > * the lots of little files doesn't scale well with the size > > of the portage tree > > Sure, that's why they invented git repack. > > > * In addition, git only allows checkins from the project parent. > > A deal breaker in my opinion > > That's not true at all. Not in any sane Git version.
Ferdy: What I meant is, if you have a change within one directory pending a commit, and you have a commit pending in a current directory, both files will be picked up for the commit. I think that is bad. That means you can't have pending changes not ready for commit and commit something. yes. git-commit will allow the commit, it will walk the directories backwards, but it will find all the pending changes and want to commit them. I don't think that is beneficial. I'm open to comments though. -ryan
pgpFFG53shvAt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
