"Fernando J. Pereda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 02:06:36PM -0700, Ryan Phillips wrote: > > > > Second issue with git, is that with lots of tiny little files things > > don't work so well. I tried converting our portage tree into a git > > tree, and it ran for around 2 days until I finally killed it. If we > > didn't want to preserve history, then maybe it would work out. But > > with the problem I outlined above I still don't see it as a contender. > > There are lots of times when one would want to do a commit in one > > directory. > > > > Ryan, > > What tool did you use for that? AFAIK parsecvs[1] has converted some > very big and broken CVS repositories successfully. > > - ferdy > > [1] git://git.freedesktop.org/~keithp/parsecvs
I was using cvs2git. I sorta like git in certain aspects. If git would work better than CVS or anything other SCM I'm for it. Right now, _anything_ would be better than CVS. -ryan
pgpDqAkxf42aD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
